Comments on: More Tweetable Scripts http://nat.org/blog/2008/04/more-tweetable-scripts/ Mon, 07 May 2012 20:05:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: more comments on Apple, and other stuff « whileloop http://nat.org/blog/2008/04/more-tweetable-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-4773 more comments on Apple, and other stuff « whileloop Tue, 04 Aug 2009 02:42:06 +0000 http://nat.org/blog/?p=826#comment-4773 [...] probably not. Also, having a look through Nat’s blog I came across these goodies (here and here). They’re from back in the middle of 2008, but are awesome for their concept and results. Nat [...] [...] probably not. Also, having a look through Nat’s blog I came across these goodies (here and here). They’re from back in the middle of 2008, but are awesome for their concept and results. Nat [...]

]]> By: TOM POTTER http://nat.org/blog/2008/04/more-tweetable-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-4325 TOM POTTER Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:49:22 +0000 http://nat.org/blog/?p=826#comment-4325 Please accept my apologies for the typing mistake in my comment above. I typed "many" instead of "any" in the second sentence for my comment above, which is: "Sorry to say that I don’t have many but I promise I’ll surely share one here if I find some script that’s interesting enough." Hope everyone here's generous enough to forgive this little typing error. Thanks in advance for understanding. Please accept my apologies for the typing mistake in my comment above. I typed “many” instead of “any” in the second sentence for my comment above, which is:
“Sorry to say that I don’t have many but I promise I’ll surely share one here if I find some script that’s interesting enough.”

Hope everyone here’s generous enough to forgive this little typing error. Thanks in advance for understanding.

]]> By: TOM POTTER http://nat.org/blog/2008/04/more-tweetable-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-4323 TOM POTTER Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:42:38 +0000 http://nat.org/blog/?p=826#comment-4323 Absolutely amazing Tweeter scripts here. Sorry to say that I don't have many but I promise I'll surely share one here if I find some script that's interesting enough. Thanks a lot for sharing these scripts. And yeah, HATS OFF to danw from me too. Happy tweeting everyone :) Absolutely amazing Tweeter scripts here. Sorry to say that I don’t have many but I promise I’ll surely share one here if I find some script that’s interesting enough. Thanks a lot for sharing these scripts. And yeah, HATS OFF to danw from me too.

Happy tweeting everyone :)

]]> By: nat http://nat.org/blog/2008/04/more-tweetable-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-638 nat Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:20:39 +0000 http://nat.org/blog/?p=826#comment-638 @danw - Glorious! @danw – Glorious!

]]> By: TheMatt http://nat.org/blog/2008/04/more-tweetable-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-635 TheMatt Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:18:43 +0000 http://nat.org/blog/?p=826#comment-635 danw gets a gold medal from me. I suspected what it would do...and yet I just had to do it. danw gets a gold medal from me. I suspected what it would do…and yet I just had to do it.

]]> By: danw http://nat.org/blog/2008/04/more-tweetable-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-633 danw Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:11:30 +0000 http://nat.org/blog/?p=826#comment-633 I can't believe no one has posted something like this yet: eval `echo eGRnLW9wZW4gaHR0cDovL3Rpbnl1cmwuY29tLzJnOW1xaA== | openssl enc -d -a` I can’t believe no one has posted something like this yet:

eval `echo eGRnLW9wZW4gaHR0cDovL3Rpbnl1cmwuY29tLzJnOW1xaA== | openssl enc -d -a`

]]> By: Felipe Kellermann http://nat.org/blog/2008/04/more-tweetable-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-627 Felipe Kellermann Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:45:00 +0000 http://nat.org/blog/?p=826#comment-627 Hello. You could replace the ";do ...;done" with ";{...;}", as this is supported on "modern" shells like bash and zsh... "for ((;i Hello. You could replace the “;do …;done” with “;{…;}”, as this is supported on “modern” shells like bash and zsh… “for ((;i

]]> By: Mitch http://nat.org/blog/2008/04/more-tweetable-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-626 Mitch Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:36:05 +0000 http://nat.org/blog/?p=826#comment-626 one more byte for you: "s:0:i" can be replaced with "s::i" one more byte for you: “s:0:i” can be replaced with “s::i”

]]> By: Mitch http://nat.org/blog/2008/04/more-tweetable-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-624 Mitch Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:00:28 +0000 http://nat.org/blog/?p=826#comment-624 Oh, and here's another byte you can save: replace the "i=0" with just "i=" An empty string will be taken as zero in bash arithmetic Oh, and here’s another byte you can save: replace the “i=0″ with just “i=” An empty string will be taken as zero in bash arithmetic

]]> By: Mitch http://nat.org/blog/2008/04/more-tweetable-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-623 Mitch Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:52:21 +0000 http://nat.org/blog/?p=826#comment-623 Here's one byte saved -- change the "while :" to "while i=0" (which will also evaluate to true) and then you can remove the "i=0" from the for(()) loop. As a bonus, it makes the script even less understandable since people will parse it as "while i==0" Here’s one byte saved — change the “while :” to “while i=0″ (which will also evaluate to true) and then you can remove the “i=0″ from the for(()) loop. As a bonus, it makes the script even less understandable since people will parse it as “while i==0″

]]> By: knipknap http://nat.org/blog/2008/04/more-tweetable-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-621 knipknap Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:31:11 +0000 http://nat.org/blog/?p=826#comment-621 [ $a -gt $b ] may be replaced by [ $a \> $b ] [ $a -gt $b ]

may be replaced by

[ $a \> $b ]

]]> By: Aaron Bockover http://nat.org/blog/2008/04/more-tweetable-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-619 Aaron Bockover Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:13:47 +0000 http://nat.org/blog/?p=826#comment-619 Word Press FTL! It at the < in my sweet shortenization! Word Press FTL! It at the < in my sweet shortenization!

]]> By: Aaron Bockover http://nat.org/blog/2008/04/more-tweetable-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-618 Aaron Bockover Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:12:24 +0000 http://nat.org/blog/?p=826#comment-618 139 characters: s=`seq 9|shuf`;while :;do for((i=0;i 139 characters:

s=`seq 9|shuf`;while :;do for((i=0;i

]]> By: nat http://nat.org/blog/2008/04/more-tweetable-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-617 nat Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:19:47 +0000 http://nat.org/blog/?p=826#comment-617 You mean the parentheses in "for((i=0;i<15;i+=2))" ? In bash you do need two there. You mean the parentheses in “for((i=0;i<15;i+=2))” ? In bash you do need two there.

]]> By: Gaute Lindkvist http://nat.org/blog/2008/04/more-tweetable-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-616 Gaute Lindkvist Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:00:07 +0000 http://nat.org/blog/?p=826#comment-616 Don't you have redundant brackets surrounding the for look in the bubble sort implementation? If you remove one set of brackets it should fit, no? Don’t you have redundant brackets surrounding the for look in the bubble sort implementation? If you remove one set of brackets it should fit, no?

]]>