Video camera
We’re in the middle of planning the next portion of our trip. I’m hoping to take and post a lot of video during this next portion of travel, and so I’m in the market for a high-quality, ultra-portable, ultra-easy video camera.
High-quality means the Flip won’t do the trick.
Ultra-portable means most standard camcorders are too big.
Ultra-easy means I don’t have to transcode the video or pull it off a tape in order to edit it.
If anyone has any suggestions, send them to nat@nat.org.
dichtbijzee on 12 February 2011 at 2:19 am
Go Pro!
I mean it, the go pro cameras are great.
Nat Friedman on 12 February 2011 at 3:59 pm
Are they? Their ads follow me all over the internet. I thought about getting one of those (or an NFlightCam) to record my flying lessons, so I could review them afterwords.
Rob on 12 February 2011 at 3:16 am
Canon S95
Nat Friedman on 12 February 2011 at 3:52 pm
Actually I just bought a rather hefty but well-performing Panasonic TM900 last night. Here are my first impressions:
So – some negatives. I’m hoping the picture quality makes up for those, or I’ll feel like a sucker who bought a video camera because it was brand new and the press-release-copypasta reviews used loads of superlative terms (“stunning!” “magnificient!” “glorious!”).