Nat Friedman

Birds

In the Everglades in December I had a lot of chances to look at birds. They were everywhere, ancient and amazing.

At the same time, I was taking flying lessons.

So it was impossible not to notice birds exploiting the same aerodynamic effects I learned from flying.

Here are a few, for your reading pleasure.

Ground Effect

Wings fly because they are supported by the air. The wing pushes down and the air pushes back up.

When a wing is very close to the ground, the air that’s pushed down is trapped between the wing and the ground and forms a higher-pressure cushion of air, giving the wing more lift, so that it can fly at a lower speed. This is called ground effect.

One of the things you figure out pretty quickly when you’re learning to land is that in ground effect, the airplane just wants to keep floating and floating. And so if you have a limited amount of runway to work with, you want to approach the landing without carrying too much extra speed.

ground effect

In Florida I noticed a lot of birds skimming the water and it was amazing how far they could glide just above the surface without having to flap their wings once.

Dihedral

Stand in front of an airplane and look at its wings and you’ll notice that they are not completely parallel to the ground – they are angled up. This angle is called the dihedral.

The purpose of the dihedral angle is to make an airplane self-stabilizing. If a gust of wind causes one wing to drop, the airplane will slip sideways toward the lower wing. This causes the lower wing to generate more lift, to rise, and to restore the airplane to wings-level, without the pilot having to do anything.

And that’s why in a little Cessna, even in slightly rough air, you can often let go of the yoke and let the plane fly itself (unless the guy sitting next to you is a big fatty and unbalances the airplane).

Soaring Turkey Vultures

Swarms of turkey vultures dot the sky over Southern Florida, making the location of every road kill.

In this picture you can see that when turkey vultures are soaring, their wings are angled up, like a Cessna (or an Airbus).

I’m not sure why some birds have dihedral and others don’t, but I suspect turkey vultures benefit from it because they do so much gliding. Some airplanes actually have negative dihedral – fighter jets, for example – to make them less stable and more maneuverable.

Landing Flare

When you’re landing an airplane, at the very end, you pull back on the yoke as the airplane sinks, to stay in the air as long as possible so that you touch down with the slowest possible airspeed.

The landing flare also angles the lift vector backwards and helps to slow the airplane down.

Unfortunately I don’t have a cool picture of this but I noticed a lot of birds would flare at the last minute before perching on a tree branch or landing on the ground. They would also flap their wings as they flared, sort of like a thrust reverser on a jet.

Gyroscopes

Of course, birds are ornithopters and fly differently from airplanes. They don’t have propellers or jets creating a longitudinal thrust.

They also don’t have spinning gyroscopes and an artificial horizon to tell them which way is up when they’re flying inside clouds, like instrument-equipped airplanes do. Which is why it has long been believed that birds cannot fly through clouds.

Or can they? Pilots have reported bird strikes in instrument conditions. And in 1972, an ornithologist in New York bought a military surplus radar and tracked birds flying through clouds for several miles – and they were going straight.

It shouldn’t be possible for birds to fly through clouds, but it is. How do they do it? Do birds have some kind of gyroscopic organ, or a magnetic sense that tells them which way is the ground?

I’ve done some googling but haven’t found a definitive answer. The best article is this 1993 classic, The Turn in The Atlantic.

Happy reading.

10 February 2011
Show comments
  1. Which is why it has long been believed that birds cannot fly through clouds.

    I’ve never heard that before, and it seems an odd thing to believe given just how far some migratory species travel. The little godwits that fly annually between Alaska and New Zealand – if they can navigate over 10,0000km, surely they’re not going to be bothered by a bit of cloud?

    Reply

    1. Typo there… should have been 10,000km.

      Reply

    2. Those birds fly high enough that they can go above any low-lying clouds, and around any storm systems.

      Most birds do avoid clouds most of the time – but some can penetrate them, sometimes, it would seem.

      Reply

  2. I’m going to go out on a limb and say at the very least birds have a pretty good accelerometer.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8sNHd0U7yw

    Reply

    1. Hahaohohhh man. That is pretty funny.

      Reply

      1. Also the comments on that video are pretty classic youtube.

        Reply

  3. I thought it was well-established that birds have a magnetic sense. At least migrating ones do.

    And, of course, like all land animals (and most fish and many invertebrates), they do have both orientation and acceleration sensors in the inner ears (we have that too). However, their brains are probably wired to work just fine with those senses alone, while ours requires input from other senses as well (like touch or vision). There aren’t really any natural situations where humans would lose both vision and touch, while birds have many such situations.

    One interesting thing about the ground effect is that drooping wing tips help to trap the air cushion under the wings. You will notice that sea birds that often exploit ground effect have these drooping wing tips, while many other birds do not.

    Reply

    1. Yeah, birds have a magnetic sense, which is helpful for navigation but it’s debatable whether it can be used for attitude control.

      The physics of flight make it very difficult to maintain attitude just by reference to acceleration changes – it’s not just a human limitation. I’d be surprised if birds could do this… that said, anything’s possible.

      That’s a neat point about drooping wing tips and ground effect!

      Thanks for your comment.

      Reply

      1. Well, if their magnetic sense (feeling the direction of north) is precise enough to navigate them thousands of miles back to their nesting place with a one mile accuracy, then it’s by definition precise enough to keep them flying straight through clouds for a few miles …

        Reply

        1. Well I doubt there are any birds that navigate thousands of miles by compass alone.

          And even if they have an infinitely precise compass in their brains, can it be used to control attitude as well as direction? Maybe. The magnetic field dips into the earth and so it’s possible… but it would be pretty surprising!

          Reply

  4. I’m not convinced that an animal flying free under it’s own power would really be susceptible to that kind of “which way is up?” disorientation that pilots can experience. Plus I guess the kinesthetic sense/proprioception would be much more developed in a group that has been flying for over 100 million years than in a plains ape that started flying yesterday.

    Seeing the polarization of light might be helpful as well; and as you said the magnetic field sense might help: Foxes use it to help calibrate their pounces, so why couldn’t birds use it in novel ways as well?

    Reply

  5. Related, slightly. Insects are theorized to fly into flames because they use a light source that should remain stationary to themselves to correct their flight path straight. You know, the Moon. Since the advent of artificial lights all over the place, and much closer, this can cause some confusion.

    I don’t have any idea at all whether birds can do something similar, but it does point out one more interesting way evolution can shape a species with regards to navigation.

    Reply

    1. To clarify. If they expect to keep the light source at a fixed position in relation to them, but it’s closer, they pass it fairly quickly. To keep it in the same position they have to turn into it.

      Reply

  6. I suppose the reasons you noted for the landing flare are true, but you left out what I feel is the most important reason for it…

    At the time of landing, the flare is used to increase the angle of attack of the wing so that it stalls and actually drops you at a relatively intended place on the runway. Without it, you *will* fly on until your airspeed naturally drops to the point where you can’t fly any longer, usually far down the runway from where you actually want to be.

    Unless, of course, you’re landing on a carrier, in which case the flare is unwanted as it detracts from your ability to touch-and-go in case you miss the hook or have some other problem that requires a second landing attempt.

    Reply

  7. Well, I can understand the difference between me standing erect and me standing up-side-down on my head! They too have a circulatory system to guide this! :)

    Reply

    1. Ah, you obviously did not read the article. There are G forces in a turn that have nothing to do with gravity.

      Reply


Copyright © 1998 - 2011 Nat Friedman